Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40769173›Full record

ArticleApplied clinical informatics2025

From Steps to Mobility Levels: Validating a Consumer-Grade Activity Monitor for Automated Recording of Patient Mobility in Hospitals.

Jan Stenum, Eric Stewart, Daniel L Young, Ioannis Collector, Karli Funk, Lydia Vincent, Elizabeth Colantuoni, Erik H Hoyer

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jan StenumDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Eric StewartDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Daniel L YoungDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Ioannis CollectorDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Karli FunkDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Lydia VincentDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Elizabeth ColantuoniDepartment of Biostatistics, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Erik H HoyerDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient mobility during hospitalization is essential for high-quality healthcare as mobility is linked to physical function and quality of life. The Johns Hopkins Highest Level of Mobility (JH-HLM) scale is a validated method to assess mobility in hospitalized patients. Although the JH-HLM is widely utilized, it has limitations including ceiling effects, unobserved mobility events going unrecorded, and the staff time needed to observe and document.We explored the feasibility of using a consumer-grade activity monitor (Fitbit) to predict JH-HLM scores and address these limitations.JH-HLM scores and step counts were recorded simultaneously using behavioral mapping and analyzed over 1-hour periods among inpatients. We predicted JH-HLM scores based on step counts by fitting ordinal logistic regressions, according to three categorizations of JH-HLM scores reflecting increasing mobility-granularity.We collected data for 189 patient-hours in a cohort of 20 participants. Step counts increased with higher JH-HLM mobility scores. When predicting JH-HLM scores from step counts, there was a trade-off between accuracy and mobility granularity: overall accuracy was 75% when categorizing patient-hours as immobility (JH-HLM of 1 to 5) or mobility (JH-HLM of 6 to 8); accuracy was 68% when categorizing immobility, shorter walking behavior (JH-HLM of 6 to 7), and longer walking behavior (JH-HLM of 8); accuracy was 61% when categorizing immobility and three progressively higher volumes of walking (JH-HLM of 6, 7 and 8).Step counts from the activity monitor could be used to predict whether a patient was immobile or mobile but may lack the sensitivity to accurately predict specific mobility levels.

Indexed as

AutomationHospitalsAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMonitoring, PhysiologicMovementWalking

Identifiers

PMID40769173
PMCPMC12328031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.