Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40769082›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia research2025

NAV-FS: A first episode psychosis services fidelity scale adapted for the NAVIGATE model.

Piper S Meyer-Kalos, Madelyn Neill, Grace Owens, Mara Russell, Kim Mueser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Piper S Meyer-KalosDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, United States. Electronic address: psmeyer@umn.edu.
Madelyn NeillDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Grace OwensDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, United States; Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder Research Program, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, United States.
Mara RussellDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Kim MueserCenter for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Departments of Occupational Therapy and Psychological & Brain Sciences, Boston University, United States.

Funding

Targeting Cognition and Motivation in Coordinated Specialty Care for Early PsychosisR01MH120589 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI MEYER-KALOS, PIPER S., VINOGRADOV, SOPHIA · 2019 to 2024
$6.1M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH120589
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coordinated Specialty Care (CSC) programs were developed to address the most common needs of people who develop a first episode of psychosis. The First Episode Psychosis Services Fidelity Scale (FEPS-FS) was designed to assess the implementation of individual evidence-based treatment components for FEP programs based on a comprehensive literature review rather than a specific treatment model (Addington et al., 2016). Since the development of the FEPS-FS, there has been a significant increase in CSC programs and in CSC treatment models delivered across the US. The FEPS-FS currently focuses more on global fidelity rather than providing specific implementation feedback aimed at quality improvement. This paper describes the development and pilot of an adapted FEP-FS scale for the NAVIGATE model (NAV-FS) to address the limitations of a nonspecific model fidelity scale. The NAV-FS retains the structure and scoring of the original FEPS-FS, but original items were modified based on NAVIGATE interventions. New items were added to more specifically assess the implementation of the NAVIGATE interventions. We compared three FEP programs using the FEPS-FS and the NAV-FS and found that the NAV-FS was feasible. Compared to the FEPS-FS, the NAV-FS provided programs with more specific suggestions for improvements in both the supported employment and education and Individual Resiliency Training interventions. The results identify the benefits of a model-specific fidelity scale aimed at increasing intervention success and improving client outcomes.

Indexed as

Mental Health ServicesPsychometricsPsychotic DisordersAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMalePilot ProjectsYoung AdultCoordinated specialty careFidelityFirst episode psychosis

Identifiers

PMID40769082
PMCPMC12629403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.