ArticlePoultry science2025
Productive energy, as determined by Arkansas net energy, predicts broiler processing weights, carcass market value, and gross profit.
Article in Poultry science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study assessed the sensitivity of Productive Energy (PE) to breast meat production, feed efficiency, and broiler economics, developed models for processing traits and economics, and examined economics dynamics. The experimental design involved 96 pens, 12 per block and eight blocks, with each pen within block receiving one of 12 dietary treatments for one week. Treatment diets, varying in amino acid concentrations, starch, and energy densities, were control-fed. The weights of processing body parts and net energy for gain (NEg) were determined with Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry, and fed heat production, fasting heat production (FHP), and net energy for maintenance (NEm) with calorimetry chambers. N-corrected apparent metabolizable energy (AMEn) was determined. PE was calculated as NEg + NEm, and classic net energy (CNE) as AMEn - heat increment (heat increment = fed heat production - FHP). Feed, protein, and energy efficiencies, and economic parameters (market value gain, MVG; gross profit gain, GPG; cents/bird per day) were calculated. Mixed models predicted the growth rate of processing parts and economic traits, and non-linear models characterized economic dynamics as the birds aged. AMEn (P < 0.04) and CNE (P < 0.02) efficiencies varied across treatments, but PE efficiency remained stable (P ≥ 0.07). PE was 2.0 and 2.7 times more sensitive (P < 0.05) than CNE to changes in breast meat gain and feed efficiency, respectively. PE, but not AMEn or CNE influenced processing and economic traits (P < 0.05), and models predicting these characteristics based on PE showed high precision (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.