Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40768750›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2025

Development of a Clinic-Based, Sociostructural Intervention to Improve the Provision of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis for Cisgender Women: Formative Study Using the Assessment, Decision, Adaptation, Production, Topical Experts, Integration, Training, and Testing (ADAPT-ITT) Framework.

Rachel Katherine Scott, Shawnika J Hull, Deanna Kerrigan, Mandi Pratt-Chapman, Tara Mathias-Prabhu, Jennifer Zack, Michelle Xu, Marisa Sadauskas, Patricia L Moriarty, Tranessa L Hanson and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Rachel Katherine ScottMedStar Health, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1519-9222
Shawnika J HullRutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3503-3289
Deanna KerriganGeorge Washington University, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7401-9159
Mandi Pratt-ChapmanGeorge Washington University, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9303-7659
Tara Mathias-PrabhuSchool of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9821-2383
Jennifer ZackSchool of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5357-7223
Michelle XuSchool of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4432-0976
Marisa SadauskasSchool of Medicine, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3972-0959
Patricia L MoriartyMedStar Health, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0009-0006-8868-1366
Tranessa L HansonMedStar Health, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0009-0002-9285-3010
Hannah AremMedStar Health, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5734-0810

Funding

Socio-Structural Intervention to Improve Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Services for Cisgender Women (CGW) (PrEP-CGW)R34MH128046 · NIMH · MEDSTAR HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI SCOTT, RACHEL K · 2021 to 2023
$712k
NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH128046
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCisgender women (subsequently referred to as women) account for 23% of new HIV diagnoses in the United States. There are significant sociostructural barriers to engagement and retention in the pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) cascade, particularly for Black women.

objectiveIn response to the lack of evidence-based interventions (EBIs) to improve PrEP initiation, adherence, and persistence among women in the United States, we developed a clinic-based, sociostructural intervention focused on engagement and retention in the PrEP cascade for women.

methodsWe used the Assessment, Decision, Adaptation, Production, Topical experts, Integration, Training, and Testing (ADAPT-ITT) model to adapt two Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) best practices in HIV prevention: HIV PrEP Services for Urban Women and Project Shikamana to create a culturally appropriate EBI responsive to Black women's HIV prevention needs. In this paper, we focus on the first 6 steps of iterative adaptation in preparation for pilot testing. We conducted semistructured interviews and focus group discussions with key populations to inform and guide intervention development and used theater testing to evaluate the mock-up of the prototype. We conducted rapid qualitative analysis to identify key themes related to delivering PrEP to the intended population and engaged subject matter experts to refine the prototype.

resultsFor the Assessment phase, we conducted 10 in-depth interviews with key informants from community-based and HIV-prevention organizations and led 7 focus group discussions (n=4-8) to guide intervention development among health care providers (n=2 groups), PrEP navigators and educators (n=1 group), and female patients (n=4 groups). Key themes included population-specific barriers to PrEP use, namely accessibility and availability, perceived risk, and stigma. In addition, participants advised on model adaptation specific to PrEP navigation, clinic-level training, and social support. For the Decision phase, we selected 2 EBIs from the CDC HIV Compendium of Best Practices. For the Adaptation phase, we adapted and theater tested a preliminary intervention for feedback. For the Production phase, using feedback from theater testing, we created a prototype of the Women's PrEP Project (W-PrEP) designed to address patient-, provider-, and clinic-level barriers to the provision of PrEP for women through a clinic-wide intervention delivering education, resources, and support (including PrEP navigation). For the Topical experts and Integration phases, we collected iterative feedback from our advisory board and subject matter experts and integrated feedback into the final prototype.

conclusionsThe adaptation of the W-PrEP integrated key elements of the local context for women with potential exposure to HIV, as well as health care providers, clinic staff, and PrEP navigators. Next steps include training clinic staff in a real-world setting to pilot-test the acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary effectiveness of the intervention.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsPre-Exposure ProphylaxisAdultAnti-HIV AgentsBlack or African AmericanFemaleHumansMiddle AgedUnited StatesAnti-HIV Agentsambulatory care facilitieseducationfemale patientHIV infectionspre-exposure prophylaxisprimary prevention

Identifiers

PMID40768750
PMCPMC12368467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.