ArticleThe Journal of urology2025
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With Transurethral Resection for Bladder Preservation: 15-Year Follow-Up of the Retained Bladder.
Article in The Journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Complete pathological response in patients with bladder cancer: predictors and outcomes.Therapeutic advances in urologyReview
- Round up.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of IndiaArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeBladder preservation is a desired goal for most patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer, although select few are ideal candidates based on established criteria. Heterogenous cohorts with short follow-up hinder assessment of true risks/benefits for ideal candidates. We describe long-term outcomes in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer, meeting established ideal criteria for bladder preservation, treated initially with systemic therapy and transurethral resection (TUR). MATERIALS AND
methodsWe conducted an institutional retrospective review of 101 prospectively monitored patients meeting "ideal" criteria for bladder preservation achieving a clinical complete response to cisplatin-based chemotherapy and TUR from 1994 to 2015, with > 10 years of follow-up. Primary end points were bladder-intact survival, local recurrence-free survival, and cancer-specific survival.
resultsFifteen-year risk of death from bladder cancer was 11% (95% CI: 5.8%, 18%), with the competing risk of death from other causes 44% (95% CI: 33%, 54%) and cystectomy risk of 11% (95% CI: 5.9%, 18%). Bladder preservation outcomes were near 40:40:10:10 for death from another cause, alive with an intact bladder, cystectomy, and death from bladder cancer. Of 41 patients alive with their bladder intact, median (IQR) follow-up time was 14 (11, 20) years. One-third relapsed locally, with the probability persisting beyond 10 years, necessitating lifetime surveillance. Our findings may not be generalizable to other settings or to patients not meeting "ideal" criteria.
conclusionsBladder preservation with neoadjuvant chemotherapy with TUR is a viable option for select patients meeting established selection criteria. Patients and physicians must consider the probabilities of long-term bladder preservation vs excess mortality when electing bladder-sparing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.