Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40768582›Full record

ArticleScience advances2025

Fluid dynamical pathways of airborne transmission while waiting in a line.

Ruixi Lou, Milo Van Mooy, Gabriel A Tarditti, Rodolfo Ostilla Monico, Varghese Mathai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ruixi LouDepartment of Physics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA.
Milo Van MooyDepartment of Physics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA.
Gabriel A TardittiSchool of Engineering, University of Cadiz, Cádiz, Andalusia 11001, Spain.ORCID 0009-0003-6692-5372
Rodolfo Ostilla MonicoSchool of Engineering, University of Cadiz, Cádiz, Andalusia 11001, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7049-2432
Varghese MathaiDepartment of Physics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7296-6056

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Waiting in a line (or a queue) is an unavoidable social interaction that occurs frequently in public spaces. Despite its wide prevalence and rich parametric variability, few studies have addressed the risks of airborne infection while waiting in a line. Here, we use a combination of laboratory experiments and direct numerical simulations to assess the flow patterns in a simplified waiting line setting. From observations of the transport of breath-like expulsions, we reveal the presence of fluid dynamical counter-currents -due to the competing effects of line kinematics and thermal gradients. Depending on the walking speed, an intermediate temperature range can potentially heighten the infection risks by allowing the breath plume to linger; however, colder and warmer ambients both suppress the spread. Current guidelines of increasing physical separation appear to have a limited impact on reducing aerosol transmission. This work highlights the need for updated transmission mitigation guidelines in settings where physical separation, interaction duration, and periodicity of movements are factors.

Identifiers

PMID40768582
PMCPMC12327468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.