Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40768557›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2025

Development and refinement of an online CARD (Comfort Ask Relax Distract) course for organizations and providers delivering vaccinations and other needle procedures.

Anna Taddio, Anthony N T Ilersich, C Meghan McMurtry, Kaytlin Constantin, Lucie M Bucci, Victoria Gudzak, Charlotte Logeman, Natalie Crown, Mandy Kohli, Erin Ledrew and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Reducing distress during vaccine injections: 2026 clinical practice guideline update.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Anna TaddioLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4432-8975
Anthony N T IlersichAnthony Ilersich Consulting, Toronto, Canada.
C Meghan McMurtryDepartment of Psychology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada.
Kaytlin ConstantinLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Lucie M BucciBucci-Hepworth Health Services Inc., Pincourt, Canada.
Victoria GudzakLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Charlotte LogemanThe Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Natalie CrownLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Mandy KohliThe Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Erin LedrewMichael Garron Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
Noni E MacDonaldFaculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
Card Knowledge Translation Team

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The CARD system (Comfort-Ask-Relax-Distract) is an evidence-based protocol for mitigating vaccine injection-related reactions, such as pain, fear and fainting. We developed a new online CARD training course to educate organizations and providers about CARD and evaluated usability and impact on conceptual knowledge and attitudes. After an initial development phase, three iterative phases of user testing were conducted in individuals with different levels of familiarity with CARD. In the first two phases, experts and non-experts provided feedback using surveys and semi-structured interviews. In the third phase, new learners answered a knowledge test and attitudes survey. Revisions occurred throughout based on qualitative and quantitative analyses, guided by the Universal Design for Learning (UDL) framework. Thirty-one healthcare providers and trainees from 8 disciplines participated across study phases. They held positive attitudes in all components of the UDL, including engagement (e.g. perceptions of relevance and value), representation (e.g. multiple ways included to perceive information, common language), and action and expression (e.g. access to materials, interactivity). Modifications addressed feedback regarding content development, organization and expression of information, and course navigation. Phase 3 participants demonstrated knowledge and positive attitudes about CARD, including confidence and intention to use CARD. In summary, this study developed and refined an online CARD course to educate organizations and providers about CARD in a feasible way and to improve readiness for implementation. The course has the potential to improve efficiency and effectiveness of CARD implementation.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelVaccinationVaccinesAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesVaccinesCARD systemmedical educationonline learningpain managementvaccination

Identifiers

PMID40768557
PMCPMC12330254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.