Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40768542›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2025

Community risk of environmental-borne cystic echinococcosis transmission in South America: Results from the multistep cross-sectional and case-control PERITAS study.

Gerardo Acosta-Jamett, Francesca Tamarozzi, Natalia Castro, Saul J Santivanez, Raul Enriquez Laurente, Cristina Mazzi, Cristian A Alvarez-Rojas, Adriano Casulli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gerardo Acosta-JamettInstituto de Medicina Preventiva Veterinaria, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile.
Francesca TamarozziDepartment of Infectious-Tropical Diseases and Microbiology, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy.
Natalia CastroCenter for Disease Surveillance and Evolution of Infectious Diseases, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile.
Saul J SantivanezResearch Department, Universidad Continental, Huancayo, Peru.
Raul Enriquez LaurenteCenter for Global Health, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
Cristina MazziClinical Research Unit, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy.
Cristian A Alvarez-RojasEscuela de Medicina Veterinaria, Facultad de Agronomía y Sistemas Naturales, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas y Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Adriano CasulliEuropean Union Reference Laboratory for Parasites (EURL-P), Department of Infectious Diseases Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9183-7591

Funding

Italian Ministry of Health “Ricerca Corrente”
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCystic echinococcosis (CE) is mainly described as a food/waterborne zoonosis. However, evidence about matrices contamination is scarce. Identifying main transmission routes could optimize health messages aiming to prevent ingestion of parasite eggs. We evaluated Echinococcus granulosus contamination of matrices in two areas of Chile and Peru. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsIn stage 1, areas with high active CE prevalence were identified through cross-sectional ultrasound surveys. Stage 2 was a case-control study encompassing matrices sampling in public places and households with and without CE cases in these areas, followed by (stage 3), matrices processing by sequential sieving and E. granulosus detection by PCR. Bayesian multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with risk of contamination. In households, soil (19%-42%); dogs' fur (10%-30%); shoes' soles (5%-33%); and dogs' feces (0-50%) were highly contaminated. In public areas, ~ 30% of fecal and soil samples were contaminated. Overall, matrices from public areas were more contaminated than those from households. When examining households, there was no difference in risk of contamination according to presence of CE cases, while CE-free households had lower risk when considering households and public areas. There was no difference in risk of contamination according to matrix. Vegetables were PCR-negative. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Results suggest the need for a paradigm-shift towards considering CE an environmental-borne infection with a "community risk" to which people are exposed.

Indexed as

EchinococcosisEchinococcus granulosusAdolescentAdultAgedAnimalsCase-Control StudiesChildChileCross-Sectional StudiesDogsFecesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSoil

Identifiers

PMID40768542
PMCPMC12342264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.