ArticlePloS one2025
DNA methylation differences stratified by normalized fetal/placental weight ratios suggest neurodevelopmental deficits in neonates with congenital heart disease.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe lack early biomarkers for predicting neurodevelopment (ND) outcomes in children with congenital heart disease (CHD). Placentas of fetuses with CHD have abnormalities, including unbalanced fetal/placental weight ratios (F/P). Although DNA methylation profiles have revealed insights into the maternal-fetal environment (MFE), it is unknown if DNA methylation correlates to normalized F/P weight ratio groups and how these differences relate to ND outcomes.
methodsWe prospectively recruited a cohort of pregnant women carrying a fetus with CHD. A subset of the cohort had DNA methylation performed on either umbilical cord blood or postnatal blood (45 full-term neonates). We calculated normalized F/P weight ratios, focusing on three normalized F/P ratio groups for analysis. We calculated differential methylation signals in eight ND disabilities-associated gene sets. Normalized F/P ratios were compared to 18-month Bayley Scales of Infant Development-III scores (BSID-III).
resultsUnbiased gene ontology enrichment analysis of differentially methylated regions revealed enrichment for brain development-related pathways. Although there were no significant differences between normalized F/P weight ratio groups and BSID-III, disease-associated gene set pathway analysis revealed significant methylation differences between the most severely unbalanced F/P weight ratio and normal F/P weight ratio groups.
conclusionGene ontology enrichment analysis of differential methylation regions revealed significant differences between normalized F/P weight ratio groups in neurogenesis genes. Furthermore, our data identified methylation differences between unbalanced and balanced normalized F/P weight ratio groups in gene pathways associated with ND dysfunction common in the aging CHD population suggesting converging pathways for ND disorders that should be investigated further.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.