Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40768406›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Protocol for a scoping review of the evidence concerning the unique needs and experiences of Orthodox Jewish women and their partners using maternity services.

Michal Rosie Meroz, Christine McCourt, Carol Rivas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michal Rosie MerozHomerton Healthcare NHS Foundation trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9294-6498
Christine McCourtCity St George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4765-5795
Carol RivasSocial Research Institute, University College London (UCL), London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0316-8090

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOrthodox Jews follow the Jewish law, Halacha, that determines most daily activities and behaviours. Halacha restrictions and the insular lifestyle of groups within the Orthodox community have led to cultural barriers when interacting with NHS maternity services in the UK. AIMS AND

objectivesThis protocol describes a scoping review that will aim to: explore the needs of Orthodox Jews when interacting with maternity services and their experiences in the UK; to what extend this topic has been studied; and identify any gaps that need further research. RATIONALE: The literature on this topic is scarce. There is an urgent need to understand the unique needs of these communities in order to make NHS maternity services accessible to all.

methodsThe scoping review will follow Arksey and O'Malley's framework for scoping reviews. We will utilise a broad search strategy that will include terms such as Orthodox Jewish, Haredi, Halacha, Needs, Experiences and Maternity Services. We will search the grey literature and databases such as OpenGrey, PubMed, Web of Science, CINHAL, SocINDEX and ProQuest. The search will be an iterative process that will be led by the search itself and the Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) work done in parallel. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Using the terms above, we will include English papers from all OECD countries, applying no restrictions on publication year. EXPECTED OUTCOMES: Mapping the literature will allow a better understanding of the needs and experiences of the Orthodox community when interacting with NHS maternity services in the UK and will lead to the next stage of the project that aims to make these services more culturally sensitive.

Indexed as

JewsJudaismMaternal Health ServicesFemaleHumansPregnancyScoping Reviews as TopicUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID40768406
PMCPMC12327656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.