Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40768405›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

HU to RGB transformation with automatic windows selection for intracranial hemorrhage classification using ncCT.

Dittapong Songsaeng, Akara Supratak, Pantid Chantangphol, Saowapot Sarumpakul, Natsuda Kaothanthong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dittapong SongsaengDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Akara SupratakFaculty of Information and Communication Technology, Mahidol University, NakhonPathom, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6739-7642
Pantid ChantangpholSirindhorn International Institute of Technology, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5465-0760
Saowapot SarumpakulDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Natsuda KaothanthongSirindhorn International Institute of Technology, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0492-9741

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This work focuses on preprocessing for classifying five categories of Intracranial Hemorrhage (ICH) using non-contrast computed tomography (ncCT). It involves assigning suitable values to window-width (WW) and window-level (WL) parameters to map Hounsfield Units on ncCT to compatible color components like RGB for display. However, clear visualization is hindered by brain component variations, individual patient conditions, and time elapsed since stroke onset. This paper introduces a preprocessing technique called HU to RGB Transformation (HRT), aimed at enhancing the visualization of hemorrhage on ncCT scans. HRT dynamically selects optimal WW and WL values from predefined settings to accentuate hemorrhage visibility. Furthermore, it leverages multiple brain components, including cerebrospinal fluid and white-and-gray matter, to further refine the delineation of hemorrhagic regions. Experimental results from a deep neural network-based image classification model are utilized to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed method. This method, serving as an image preprocessing step, demonstrates remarkable capability in classifying five distinct types of Intracranial Hemorrhage and normal slice, achieving an average sensitivity of 89.35% and an average specificity of 96.03%. Moreover, direct assessment of HRT preprocessed images leads to enhanced type classification accuracy by residents, with a sensitivity of 97.39% and a specificity of 96.19%. These results surpass those obtained from reading DICOM files achieving 93.31% sensitivity and 94.81% specificity.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedIntracranial HemorrhagesTomography, X-Ray ComputedAlgorithmsBrainHumansNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID40768405
PMCPMC12327671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.