SynthesisNursing open2025
Real-Time Prediction of Correct Yoga Asanas in Healthy Individuals With Artificial Intelligence Techniques: A Systematic Review for Nursing.
Synthesis in Nursing open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThis study aims to systematically review the real-time prediction of yoga asanas using artificial intelligence (AI) techniques to improve the quality of life in healthy individuals.
designSystematic review.
methodsA comprehensive literature review was conducted in English using the keywords 'yoga', 'asana', 'pose', 'posture', 'machine learning', 'deep learning' and 'prediction' in the Web of Science, Google Scholar, PubMed and Scopus databases. The objective was to identify all relevant studies on the topic. Two independent researchers screened the titles and abstracts of the retrieved publications, applying the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies for quality assessment. The initial search yielded 3250 studies (Google Scholar: 3190, PubMed: 19, Scopus: 27, Web of Science: 14). After applying inclusion criteria, 15 studies were included in the final systematic review.
resultsAmong the included studies, nine employed deep learning (DL) models, three utilised machine learning (ML) and three applied a combination of both DL and ML techniques. The primary statistical evaluation method for real-time prediction was accuracy across all studies. The highest accuracy rates were observed in studies using DL models alone (min = 92.34%, max = 99.92%), followed by studies that combined DL and ML (min = 91.49%, max = 99.58%), and those using only ML (min = 90.9%, max = 98.51%). These findings indicate that integrating DL and ML models can enhance the accuracy of real-time yoga asana prediction. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The findings advocate for the implementation of DL and ML models in clinical and community settings to improve the real-time and precise prediction of yoga asanas, a well-established evidence-based nursing intervention for healthy individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.