ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025
Immiscible proteins compete for RNA binding to order condensate layers.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Scanning transcriptomes for nonlinear, domain-level similarities using hmSEEKR.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Combinatorial decision-making driven by multicomponent surface condensates.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- The Polymers of Life: Exploring Cellular Function Through Polymer Concepts.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Small heat shock proteins and biomolecular condensates.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2026Review
- Paraspeckle condensation is controlled via TDP-43 polymerization and linked to neuroprotection.Nature cell biology · 2026Article
- Simultaneous Visualization of NEAT1_2 and Paraspeckle Proteins by Sequential RNA-FISH and Immunofluorescence.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Multiphasic Organization and Differential Dynamics of Proteins within Protein-DNA Biomolecular Condensates.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2025Article
- Rapid depletion and super-resolution microscopy reveal dual roles of SRSF5 in coordinating nuclear speckle-paraspeckle crosstalk during cellular stress.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biomolecular condensates mediate diverse and essential cellular functions by compartmentalizing biochemical pathways. Many condensates have internal subdomains with distinct compositional identities. A major challenge lies in dissecting the multicomponent logic that relates biomolecular features to emergent condensate organization. Nuclear paraspeckles are paradigmatic examples of multidomain condensates, comprising core and shell layers with distinct compositions that are scaffolded by the lncRNA NEAT1, which spans both layers. A prevailing model of paraspeckle assembly proposes that core proteins bind directly and specifically to core-associated NEAT1 domains. Combining informatics and biochemistry, we unexpectedly find that the essential core proteins FUS and NONO bind and condense preferentially with shell-associated NEAT1 domains. The shell protein TDP-43 exhibits similar NEAT1 domain preferences on its own but forms surfactant-like shell layers around core protein-driven condensates when both are present. Together, experiments and physics-based simulations suggest that competitive RNA binding and immiscibility between core and shell proteins order paraspeckle layers. More generally, we propose that subcondensate organization can spontaneously arise from a balance of collaborative and competitive protein binding to the same domains of a lncRNA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.