Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40768298›Full record

ReviewJournal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN2025

Remote Measurement of Volume Status in Heart Failure.

Nayan Arora, Conrad J Macon, Christopher Chien

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nayan AroraDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Conrad J MaconDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Christopher ChienDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.ORCID 0000-0001-5425-6034

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heart failure admissions are driven by elevated cardiac filling pressures culminating in symptoms of congestion and result in a significant burden to both patients and society. Traditional strategies of monitoring changes in weight and symptoms to trigger adjustments in therapy, even when combined with telemedicine services, have failed to improve outcomes. Implantable hemodynamic monitors allow clinicians to obtain meaningful, objective data, with an opportunity for early intervention to improve outcomes. Patients with concomitant kidney disease represent a particularly vulnerable population with higher rates of hospitalization compared with patients with heart failure and normal kidney function. Several studies have demonstrated a reduction in hospitalization rates with the use of ambulatory hemodynamic monitors. In the following review, we discuss the existing literature, including studies in patients with kidney disease, and highlight future innovations in the field.

Indexed as

Heart FailureHumansTelemedicineheart failurehypertension and cardiorenal disorders

Identifiers

PMID40768298
PMCPMC12677821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.