Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40768292›Full record

ReviewJournal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN2025

Noninvasive Diagnosis of Kidney Allograft Rejection.

Rute Cardoso de Aguiar, Michelle Willicombe, Candice Roufosse

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rute Cardoso de AguiarDepartment of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8700-3295
Michelle WillicombeDepartment of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6404-0584
Candice RoufosseDepartment of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6490-4290

Funding

NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Center
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite regular conventional monitoring of kidney transplant recipients, allograft rejection remains a barrier for the long-term success of kidney transplantation and is one of the leading causes of graft failure. Kidney transplant rejection and graft failure are reported as the most feared outcomes by patients. Timely diagnosis of rejection and early treatment enables interventions that may attenuate alloimmune processes before irreversible graft injury has occurred. The evolving landscape of noninvasive diagnostic tools presents promising opportunities for early detection of kidney allograft rejection. These tools, alone or combined, may promptly signal the need for a biopsy, reduce the need for surveillance biopsies, or even potentially inform treatment monitoring. Therefore, they are of utmost importance, and their use should be informed by evidence, guiding both patients and their clinical teams. This review will cover noninvasive tests used for the diagnosis of kidney allograft rejection available or soon to be available in the clinical setting and describe their diagnostic context, strengths, and limitations, while proposing an ideal clinical framework for their use.

Indexed as

Graft RejectionKidney TransplantationAllograftsBiomarkersHumansBiomarkersacute allograft rejectionacute rejectionbiomarkerskidney transplantationrejectiontransplantationtransplant pathology

Identifiers

PMID40768292
PMCPMC12591687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.