ArticleEuropean journal of epidemiology2025
Complex methods for complex data: key considerations for interpretable and actionable results in exposome research.
Article in European journal of epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Structure-Function Decoupling of the Sensorimotor and Default Mode Networks in Black Americans With MS.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2026Article
- The Digital Exposome: A Life Course Framework for Health in the Digital Age.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Causality and exposome.European journal of epidemiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Complex multidimensional data are becoming more widely available and are drastically affecting the way epidemiological studies are designed and conducted. Novel frameworks such as the exposome-which encompasses the comprehensive and cumulative set of exposures affecting individuals throughout their lifetime and the complex mechanisms through which they act - provide a unique opportunity to transform how public health recommendations are identified at the population and individual level. This data revolution is accompanied by a growing interest in analytical approaches that can handle the complexity of these novel research questions. These include semi-parametric and non-parametric statistical and machine learning methodologies that provide compelling frameworks for analyzing large-scale databases while mitigating overfitting. Nevertheless, interpreting results from these complex methods is often challenging. While discussions on interpretability have largely focused on statistical inference, causal considerations and the practical applicability of the findings to inform the design of tangible interventions have received less attention-despite being essential components of epidemiological research. With this commentary we provide a general overview of these three levels of interpretability-statistical, causal, and actionable-and discuss available tools that can aid epidemiologists to improve results interpretability as they start utilizing more complex analytical approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40768123What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.