Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40768113›Full record

SynthesisJournal of robotic surgery2025

The learning curve of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hassaan Abdel Khalik, James Abesteh, Mohamed Aldawodi, Vickas Khanna, Anthony Adili

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Learning curve in image-based robotic assisted total knee arthroplasty: a MAKO-robot experience.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026
    Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hassaan Abdel KhalikDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. Hassaan.abdel-khalik@medportal.ca.
James AbestehMichael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Mohamed AldawodiDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Vickas KhannaDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Anthony AdiliDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To assess the learning curve of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) as well as its impact on operative time, patient-reported outcomes (PROMs), radiologic outcomes, and complications. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were searched from inception to October 4, 2024, for studies with the objective of assessing RA-TKA's learning curve. The median learning curve across all studies was calculated. Meta-analyses were conducted on comparative studies reporting outcomes stratified by learning phase or comparing RA-TKA's proficiency phase with conventional total knee arthroplasty (C-TKA). Thirty-one studies (9916 knees) were analyzed. The median learning curve was 17 cases (IQR 9 to 27). Operative time across all eligible comparative studies was 14.19 min shorter in the late/proficiency phase relative to the early/learning phase (p < 0.000). For studies explicitly reporting skin incision to skin closure times, operative time was 17.03 min shorter in the late/proficiency group (p < 0.0001). No clinically significant differences in radiologic parameters were identified across RA-TKA learning and proficiency groups. There was a significant reduction in hip-knee angle outliers in favor of the RA-TKA proficiency group compared to C-TKA (OR 0.11; 95%CI 0.05, 0.27; p < 0.00001). No significant differences were demonstrated in PROMs or complications rates across learning versus proficiency groups. The adoption of RA-TKA is safe and does not result in clinically relevant differences in radiologic outcomes or PROMs across learning and proficiency phases. There is, however, a significant reduction in operative time of up to 17 min from the learning to proficiency phase, which should be factored into operative planning.Level of evidence: IV.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeLearning CurveRobotic Surgical ProceduresHumansOperative TimePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresArthroplastyLearning curveMeta-analysisRobotic-assistedSystematic reviewTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.