ArticleClinical rheumatology2025
Suboptimal methotrexate utilization in Chinese patients with inflammatory arthritis: data from a Chinese center.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveMethotrexate (MTX) is a cornerstone treatment for inflammatory arthritis and its suboptimal usage can lead to low therapeutic response rates. We aim to describe the situation of daily usage of MTX among Chinese patients.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cross-sectional survey in consecutive outpatients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or psoriatic arthritis (PsA). A structured questionnaire was developed to collect data on current or previous MTX usage, including dosage, combination therapies, and incidence of side effects. Adherence rates were calculated.
resultsA total of 340 patients with RA and 97 patients with PsA were included. Among them, 276 (81.2%) patients with RA and 78 (80.4%) patients with PsA were currently taking MTX. The average dosage of current MTX use was 9.68 ± 1.65 mg/week in patients with RA and 9.68 ± 1.15 mg/week in patients with PsA, with a range of 2.5-15 mg/week. The adherence rates were 74.6% in RA and 74.4% in PsA. Only 9.8% of patients with RA and 5.1% of patients with PsA received MTX monotherapy currently. MTX withdrawal occurred in 64 (18.8%) patients with RA and 19 (19.6%) in patients with PsA. The major reasons for MTX withdrawal were nausea (33.7%) and abnormal liver function (32.5%). Among the patients who discontinued MTX, 20 (24.1%) patients refused to take MTX due to worrying about the possible side effects.
conclusionA high rate of inadequate dosage of MTX was used among Chinese patients with inflammatory arthritis, suggesting that MTX might not fully exert its therapeutic efficacy. Key Points • MTX dosage was inadequate among Chinese patients. • MTX adherence rates were suboptimal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40768107What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.