Trial reportIntensive care medicine2025
Heterogenous treatment effect of neuromuscular blocking agents for moderate-to-severe ARDS: a post hoc Markov model re-analysis of the ACURASYS trial.
Trial report in Intensive care medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS): epidemiology, etiology, molecular mechanisms, diagnosis and therapeutic strategies.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- Update on acute respiratory failure.Intensive care medicine · 2026Article
- Advances in Imaging and Physiology-Guided Personalized Care in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Patient Self-Inflicted Lung Injury in ARDS: From Physiological Concept to Clinical Syndrome.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Refining the use of neuromuscular blockade in ARDS: lessons from a post hoc Markov model re-analysis of the ACURASYS trial.Intensive care medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe beneficial effects of systematic cisatracurium administration observed in the ACURASYS randomized, multicenter, double-blinded trial may depend on patient-specific factors. This post hoc analysis aimed to explore whether the impact of cisatracurium on mortality varies with baseline characteristics.
methodsA Markov chain analysis was conducted using daily clinical states from inclusion to day 90: death (state 0), under mechanical ventilation (state 1), or weaned and alive at day 90 (state 2). Patient trajectories were modeled accordingly.
resultsAmong the 321 included patients, subgroup analysis following univariate analysis focused on 130 individuals under 60 years with non-fatal McCabe scores. Within this subgroup, cisatracurium administration and absence of vasopressor use significantly reduced the probability of remaining ventilated. Estimated survival increased therefore from 0.63 (placebo group, N = 62) to 0.93 (cisatracurium group, N = 68). In contrast, among patients with a rapidly or ultimately fatal prognosis according to McCabe score, the probability of survival did not differ substantially between the placebo and cisatracurium groups. Among patients with a PaO
conclusionThe systematic and short-term administration of cisatracurium in patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS appears to confer greater survival benefit in those with a higher baseline life expectancy. Further validation through retrospective and prospective studies is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40768068What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.