ArticleTropical animal health and production2025
Superovulation for in vivo embryo production reduces the prevalence of clinical and cytological endometritis in Girolando cows.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This longitudinal observational study was performed to evaluate the temporal dynamics in the occurrence of Cytological Endometritis (CytoE) and the recovery of embryos produced in vivo in Girolando cows positive or not for CytoE. A total of 160 cows were evaluated (81 primiparous and 79 multiparous). Endometrial cytology, ovarian and uterine evaluation, vaginal discharge, cervix, and body condition score were done 21, 42, and 65 days postpartum. At 47 days postpartum 61 cows received a superovulation treatment (SOV), were inseminated, and subjected to embryo collection, and 48 cows were not subjected to SOV but received uterine flushing. The remaining cows were not available for this part of the study. The variables analyzed were PMN% (≥ 5%), uterine condition, cervix, and body condition score, clinical or CytoE, quantity and quality of recovery embryos. PMN% decreased over time (p < 0.05), as well as the VDS (D21 to D42, p < 0.0001). There was an association between submission to the SOV and the absence of CytoE on D65 postpartum (p < 0.01). Superovulation was beneficial for Girolando cows that had cytological and clinical endometritis at the end of the voluntary waiting period; the temporal dynamics related to the occurrence of cytological and clinical endometritis starting on D21 postpartum showed that Girolando cows recovered from the inflammatory processes within 42 days postpartum. The data suggest that Girolando cows can be used as embryo donors during the end of the voluntary waiting period without losses to subsequent pregnancy rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40768056What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.