ReviewWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2025
Bifidobacteria in antibiotic-associated dysbiosis: restoring balance in the gut microbiome.
Review in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immunoprotective and neuroprotective properties of gut microbiome in psoriasis.Journal of translational autoimmunity · 2026Review
- Clostridium Butyricum and Bifidobacterium Supplementation Ameliorates Gut Dysbiosis and Cognitive-Anxiety Behaviors in Preterm Mice.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Article
- Phytosynbiotic Containing Double-Layer MicroencapsulatedAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Recent advances in the positive role ofFrontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Effects of DifferentMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Application and Challenges of Using ProbioticDiseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Microbiome-based therapeutics for metabolic disorders: harnessing microbial intrusions for treatment.Frontiers in medical technology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antibiotic-associated dysbiosis disrupts the gut's microbial balance, leading to reduced diversity, overgrowth of antibiotic-resistant strains, and compromised gut homeostasis. This can result in inflammation, increased intestinal permeability, impaired immunity, and heightened susceptibility to infections. In this context, probiotics have been highlighted as a promising remedy in alleviating this antibiotic-induced gut microbiome aberrations with subsequent decrease of the detrimental effects. Bifidobacteria, a prominent bacterial group with promising probiotic attributes, have shown effectiveness in restoring the gut microbiome by strong adherence to the colon's mucosal lining and enhancing the immune response through increased anti-inflammatory cytokines. They also play a crucial role as key producers of acetic acid, which supports butyric acid-producing bacteria essential for colonocyte health during dysbiosis. The synergistic use of bifidobacteria with other probiotic species or prebiotic substrates has further enhanced their survival, colonization capacity, and overall impact on gut microbial restoration. Advanced metagenomic analyses have begun to reveal strain-specific functions, paving the way for personalized probiotic therapies tailored to an individual's unique microbiome profile. Despite encouraging progress, critical research gaps persist, particularly regarding strain-specific efficacy, formulation stability, long-term outcomes, underlying mechanisms, systemic interactions, and the distinct and specific role of bifidobacteria. Addressing these gaps through targeted clinical investigations is essential to fully harness their therapeutic potential and develop optimized strategies for restoring the microbial balance in the gut microbiome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40767981What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.