Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40767949›Full record

SynthesisInternational urology and nephrology2026

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of stone-free rates and complication profiles.

Zunaira Naeem, Pakeezah Tabasum, Manahil Mustajab, Ahsan Abid, Muhammad Athar Khawaja, Hussain Ramzan, Yasmeen Sufi, Muhammad Talha, Nabeeha Noor, Imran Saeed and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-AnalysisComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International urology and nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Zunaira NaeemAllama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan.
Pakeezah TabasumRahmah Academy of Research Excellence, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Manahil MustajabDow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Ahsan AbidSahiwal Medical College and Teaching Hospital, Sahiwal, Pakistan.
Muhammad Athar KhawajaRahmah Academy of Research Excellence, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Hussain RamzanRahmah Academy of Research Excellence, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Yasmeen SufiRahmah Academy of Research Excellence, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Muhammad TalhaNishtar Medical University and Hospital, Multan, Pakistan.
Nabeeha NoorSahiwal Medical College and Teaching Hospital, Sahiwal, Pakistan.
Imran SaeedRahmah Academy of Research Excellence, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Muhammad Usman HashmiRahmah Academy of Research Excellence, Islamabad, Pakistan. muh.haashmi@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNephrolithiasis is a highly prevalent urological condition, necessitating effective and minimally invasive treatment strategies. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) are commonly employed for managing renal calculi, but their comparative efficacy and safety remain subjects of ongoing debate. This meta-analysis aims to synthesize current evidence, providing a comprehensive assessment of surgical outcomes between PCNL and RIRS for renal stones under 2 cm and greater than 2 cm, reported across different study designs, various surgical techniques, and different geographical distributions to guide clinical decision-making.

methodsA systematic literature search was conducted across electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, and Clinicaltrials.gov, up to December 2024. Risk of Bias assessment was conducted using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for non-randomized cohort studies and the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 (RoB 2.0) tool for RCTs. Data extraction focused on key outcomes such as stone-free rate, complications, operation time, hospital stay, and the need for blood transfusions. Statistical analysis utilized a random-effects model to pool data, with heterogeneity assessed using the I

resultsThe analysis of 62 studies (25 were RCTs and 37 were cohorts) with 7021 patients revealed a significantly higher stone-free rate in the PCNL group compared to RIRS (RR: 1.06, 95% CI [1.04, 1.09], p < 0.00001), indicating greater efficacy in stone clearance. However, PCNL was associated with a significantly higher risk of complications (RR: 1.49, 95% CI [1.25, 1.77], p < 0.00001) and a greater need for blood transfusions (RR: 3.20, 95% CI [1.70, 6.03], p = 0.0003), associated with increased risk. Post-operative hematuria was marginally higher in the PCNL group (RR: 2.06, 95% CI [1.01, 4.19], p = 0.05). Among the PCNL techniques, all PCNL techniques showed significantly higher Hb drop; micro-PCNL was associated with the smallest hemoglobin drop relative to RIRS (MD = 0.62, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.86), followed by mini-PCNL and standard-PCNL. Operation times were comparable between the two procedures, but PCNL resulted in a significantly longer hospital stay (MD: 1.73, 95% CI [1.35, 2.10], p < 0.00001).

conclusionPCNL demonstrates a superior stone-free rate for renal stones under 2 cm and greater than 2 cm, but this is accompanied by a higher risk of complications and a longer hospital stay compared to RIRS. RIRS offers a safer alternative with fewer complications and shorter hospital stays, making it a viable option for at-risk patients. The use of miniaturized PCNL techniques appears to mitigate some of the complication risks associated with traditional PCNL, potentially offering a balance between efficacy and safety. Clinical decision-making should be individualized, considering patient and stone characteristics, surgeon experience, and the availability of advanced PCNL techniques.

Indexed as

Kidney CalculiNephrolithotomy, PercutaneousPostoperative ComplicationsHumansKidneyKidney stonesMinimally invasive surgeryPercutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL)Renal stonesRetrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS)Stone-free rateUrolithiasis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.