ArticleHerzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie2025
[Pediatric and congenital arrhythmia treatment : A complex interplay between expertise, re-imbursement, and industry].
Article in Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Children, adolescents, and patients with congenital heart defects exhibit a unique and broad spectrum of arrhythmias. Diagnosis and treatment of these arrhythmias requires highly specialized medical care structures. In addition to highly qualified medical expertise, this includes appropriate antiarrhythmic drugs and medical devices specifically tailored to this patient group for catheter ablation and device therapy. The increasing economization of the healthcare system and legal requirements-particularly the EU Medical Device Regulation-are jeopardizing existing and urgently needed new care structures due to staff shortages, insufficient training capacities, and the discontinuation of production of relevant medical devices. The resulting threat to this patient group urgently necessitates reforms to the funding of existing highly specialized care structures, as well as more attractive framework conditions for the industry for the development and approval of antiarrhythmic drugs and medical devices specifically tailored to the needs of these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40767913What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.