SynthesisEuropean radiology2026
CT diagnostic performance for preoperative staging of colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07255729 (Machine Learning-Based Exosomal microRNA Signature for Preoperative Staging and Chemotherapy Eligibility in Colon Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Machine Learning-Based Exosomal microRNA Signature for Preoperative Staging and Chemotherapy Eligibility in Colon Cancer
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of inter-reader agreement and diagnostic performance of Node-RADS in colon cancer.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Predictive value of computed tomography radiomics for lymphatic-vascular space infiltration in colon cancer.American journal of cancer research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo conduct a meta-analysis evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography (CT) for identifying T3-T4 colon cancer using histopathology as the reference standard. Secondary objectives included assessing CT's performance for detecting extramural vascular invasion (EMVI) and nodal involvement. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis followed PRISMA-DTA guidelines and searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library for studies published up to September 2024. Eligible studies evaluated CT for preoperative T staging (T3 or higher), EMVI, and/or nodal status in primary colon cancer, reporting sensitivity and specificity. Studies on rectal cancer, using specialized CT techniques, or not in English, were excluded. Pooled sensitivity and specificity for T staging, EMVI, and nodal status were calculated using a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses explored sources of heterogeneity.
resultsThirty-two studies, including 222,948 patients (mean age 69 years; 50.5% female), were analyzed. For pT3-T4 staging, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.81 (95% CI: 0.76-0.85) and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.66-0.83). For pT3c-T4, sensitivity was 0.71 (95% CI: 0.62-0.79) and specificity was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.74-0.89). EMVI detection showed sensitivity of 0.40 (95% CI: 0.30-0.52) and specificity of 0.80 (95% CI: 0.71-0.87). A reliable pooled estimate for nodal status could not be determined.
conclusionCT shows good diagnostic performance for identifying T3-T4 colon cancer and can detect high-risk features like EMVI. These findings support its role in selecting candidates for neoadjuvant therapies, although EMVI sensitivity remains limited. KEY POINTS: Question How accurate is CT for identifying T3-T4 colon cancer and detecting key prognostic factors like EMVI to support neoadjuvant treatment planning? Findings CT shows good accuracy for T3-T4 staging (sensitivity 0.81; specificity 0.75) and high specificity (0.80) but low sensitivity (0.40) for EMVI. Clinical relevance CT enables reliable identification of locally advanced colon cancer and high-risk features such as EMVI, supporting better patient selection and personalized neoadjuvant treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40767870What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.