ArticleEpidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil2025
Cross-sectional study of dietary practices from the Dietary Guidelines for the Brazilian Population among users of a Basic Health Unit in Pelotas, 2022.
Article in Epidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveDescribe dietary practices recommended in the Dietary Guidelines and the association with sociodemographic factors and lifestyle habits in users of the nutrition service at a Basic Health Unit in Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul in 2022.
methodsCross-sectional study with individuals aged ≥20 years who received nutritional care. The questionnaire used included a scale validated for the Brazilian population, which considers three domains of food consumption: domestic planning and organization, food choice and eating habits. Practices with a frequency of 60% or more were considered appropriate to the recommendations of the Dietary Guidelines.
resultsAmong the 162 interviewees, only the eating practices related to the domain of eating habits were adequate. The mean adequacy score was 39.0 points with a standard deviation of 5.4 points and a median of 39.0 points. The mean adequacy score was statistically higher among respondents who declared themselves to be race/skin color brown/black, who had 40.4 points with a 95% confidence interval (95%CI 39.1; 41.7) and among those active in their free time, who had 40.4 points (95%CI 39.0; 41.8), after adjustments for demographic and socioeconomic variables.
conclusionThe adequacy score values were higher in brown/black individuals and those who practiced some kind of physical activity during leisure time. Practices related to the domains of planning and food choices should be prioritized in nutritional counseling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.