ArticleCritical care science2025
The impact of mechanical ventilation on long-term survival influences definitions of persistent critical illness.
Article in Critical care science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Remote Multicomponent Rehabilitation and Cost-Effectiveness in Survivors of Critical Illness.JAMA network open · 2026Trial
- Determinants of fatal outcome in septic shock patients with euthyroid sick syndrome.World journal of critical care medicine · 2026Article
- A Reflection on Current Definitions of Critical Care and Critical Illness-A Narrative Review of the Literature.Nursing in critical care · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere are notable gaps in the understanding of the underlying pathophysiology of persistent critical illness (PerCI) and its extensive implications for patient outcomes. In this context, whether different PerCI definitions could yield distinct long-term outcomes for intensive care unit survivors is currently unknown.
methodsThis prospective cohort study spanned 10 Brazilian hospitals from March 2015 to December 2017. We enrolled emergency medical and surgical patients with intensive care unit stays exceeding 72 hours and tracked them for more than 12 months after intensive care unit discharge. Chronic patients were classified using four widely recognized persistent critical illness definitions from the literature: 1) mechanical ventilation > 21 days or tracheostomy for mechanical ventilation weaning; 2) mechanical ventilation duration > 14 days; 3) intensive care unit stay > 10 days; and 4) intensive care unit stay > 8 days accompanied by specific clinical conditions warranting extended intensive care unit care. Additionally, the data were compared to those of survivors who did not meet any of the four persistent critical illness criteria.
resultsThe study enrolled 1,616 patients, with 609 (37.7%) fulfilling one or more persistent critical illness definitions. The twelve-month survival rates among persistent critical illness patients varied by definition. At 12 months, patients with PerCI definitions centered on mechanical ventilation duration had markedly lower survival rates than non-persistent critical illness patients did (definition 1: HR: 1.49, 95%CI: 1.10 - 2.02; definition 2: HR: 1.66, 95%CI: 1.20 - 2.30). In contrast, definitions based on intensive care unit length of stay produced survival rates more aligned with non-persistent critical illness patients (definition 3: HR: 1.01, 95%CI: 0.82 - 1.25; definition 4: HR: 1.10, 95%CI: 0.88 - 1.30).
conclusionCompared with other critically ill patients, patients with persistent critical illness definitions that are based on the duration of mechanical ventilation are associated with reduced 12-month survival, highlighting the impact of prolonged respiratory support on patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.