ArticleBrazilian oral research2025
Accessibility for people with motor disabilities at CEOs in Brazil: an ecological study.
Article in Brazilian oral research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective was to compare physical accessibility indicators for people with motor disabilities (PwMD) at dental specialty centers (acronym in Portuguese - CEO) across Brazil during the two evaluation cycles of the Access and Quality Improvement Program (acronym in Portuguese - PMAQ) for CEOs. This ecological study utilized secondary data from the external evaluation of PMAQ-CEO in Cycle I (C1), conducted in 2014, and Cycle II (C2), conducted in 2018, including all CEOs that participated in both cycles (n = 889). The structural items analyzed included corridors and doors adapted for wheelchairs, functional wheelchairs, access ramps with handrails, and bathrooms adapted for PwMD. Latent class transition analysis was applied to identify patterns in physical accessibility among CEOs, selecting the latent status (LS) model based on conceptual interpretability and goodness of fit. The final model identified five LS, labeled as follows: LS1 (most accessible); LS2 (inappropriate doors and bathrooms); LS3 (inappropriate ramps and bathrooms); LS4 (wheelchair unavailability); and LS5 (least accessible). In C1, 33.9% of the CEOs were highly accessible, while 17% were minimally accessible. In C2, these proportions shifted to 69.7% for highly accessible and 6% for minimally accessible. When analyzing the two PMAQ-CEO cycles, improvements in physical accessibility indicators were observed across Brazilian CEOs: corridors (9.7% increase) and doors (4.9%) adapted for wheelchairs; functional wheelchairs (15.7%); access ramps with handrails (38.7%); and bathrooms adapted for PwMD (19.6%). It may be concluded that physical barriers to PwMD in Brazilian CEOs were significantly reduced between 2014 and 2018, improving physical accessibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.