ArticleEinstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2025
Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the 2017 Oncology Nurse Navigator Core Competencies in Brazil.
Article in Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to translate and cross-culturally adapt the Oncology Nurse Navigator Core Competencies 2017 instrument into Brazilian Portuguese.
methodsThis study used a methodological cross-cultural adaptation approach. After authorization from the authors of the original version of the Oncology Nurse Navigator Core Competencies 2017 comprising 52 competencies, the instrument was translated following the recommended guidelines. A panel of five oncology specialists evaluated and consolidated the translation. To analyze the adequacy of the translation, 59 nurse judges-all oncology nurse navigators-were recruited using the snowball technique. Data was collected between December 2020 and August 2022.
resultsThe first and second rounds of assessing the suitability of the translated competencies involved 24 and 17 judges, respectively. Their average age was 37.5 years and the majority (87.5%) were women. After incorporating the requested adjustments based on feedback from the second round, the questions exhibited satisfactory proportions of agreement and content validity ratios.
conclusionThe 52 competencies in 5 categories were adapted and adequate according to the proportions of agreement and content validity ratios, which assumed values compatible with those suggested for adequacy. We therefore conclude that these competencies enable a better understanding of the role and performance of oncology nurse navigators in the Brazilian context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.