Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40767522›Full record

ArticlemBio2025

Genome-wide CRISPR screen reveals key role of sialic acids in PEDV and porcine coronavirus infections.

Guanghao Guo, Mengjia Zhang, Zhuojia Xu, Peng Xi, Hongmei Zhu, Anouk Evers, Robert Jan Lebbink, Yifei Lang, Qigai He, Yao-Wei Huang and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mBio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cell entry mechanisms of porcine enteric coronaviruses.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Guanghao Guo *National Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.ORCID 0009-0003-1504-759X
Mengjia Zhang *National Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Zhuojia XuState Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology, Carbohydrate-Based Drug Research Center, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Peng XiNational Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Hongmei ZhuNational Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Anouk EversDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Robert Jan LebbinkDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Yifei LangCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Qigai HeNational Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Yao-Wei HuangState Key Laboratory for Animal Disease Control and Prevention, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9755-8411
Tiehai LiState Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology, Carbohydrate-Based Drug Research Center, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3600-1828
Berend Jan BoschVirology Section, Infectious Diseases and Immunology Division, Department of Biomolecular Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3864-232X
Wentao LiNational Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7114-762X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) is a globally distributed alphacoronavirus with economic importance that can cause severe watery diarrhea and even death in piglets. To identify host factors essential for PEDV infection, we performed a genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 screen in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells (Huh7) using the highly virulent PEDV GIIb strain GDU. Several genes involved in the sialic acid and heparan sulfate biosynthesis pathway and cholesterol metabolism were highly enriched following PEDV selection. We validated that the host factor ST3 beta-galactoside alpha-2,3-sialyltransferase 4 (ST3GAL4), which catalyzes the transfer of sialic acid to sugar chains via α2,3-linked linkages, is important for PEDV infection. To systematically investigate the role of sialic acid in PEDV infection, we knocked out genes related to sialic acid synthesis. This led to a reduced abundance of sialic acid on the cell surface, which in turn inhibited PEDV adsorption and internalization. Furthermore, we found that both α2,3-linked and α2,6-linked sialic acids can serve as cellular attachment factors for PEDV. We conducted a glycan microarray screen to determine which sialoglycans are preferred by the PEDV spike protein. The results revealed that PEDV favors binding to α2,3-sialoglycans. Additionally, we found that not only current circulating PEDV strains but also other porcine coronaviruses rely on sialic acid for efficient infection. Collectively, our findings provide insights into critical host factors involved in PEDV infection and demonstrate that disrupting genes involved in sialic acid biosynthesis negatively affects the infectivity of multiple porcine enteric coronaviruses.IMPORTANCEA wide range of viruses utilize sialic acid as receptors. Sialic acid binding may serve as a key determinant of viral host range. Different viruses exhibit distinct preferences for specific types of sialic acid linkages. However, it remains unclear which specific subtypes of sialic acid are utilized during PEDV infection. In this study, we performed CRISPR-based genome-wide knockout screening and identified ST3GAL4 as a key host factor for PEDV infection. Furthermore, we found that both α2,3-linked and α2,6-linked sialic acids can function as attachment factors for PEDV infection. A glycan microarray screen revealed that PEDV S1 shows the strongest binding preference for α2,3-linked and α2,8-linked sialosides. Sialic acids were also implicated in infections by other porcine enteric coronaviruses. Overall, our findings advance our understanding of viral entry mechanisms of PEDV and other swine coronaviruses and may provide avenues for designing antiviral strategies.

Indexed as

Coronavirus InfectionsCRISPR-Cas SystemsN-Acetylneuraminic AcidPorcine epidemic diarrhea virusSialic AcidsSwine DiseasesAnimalsCell LineClustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansSialyltransferasesSwineVirus InternalizationN-Acetylneuraminic AcidSialic AcidsSialyltransferasescoronavirusesPEDVsialic acidSLC35A1ST3GAL4ST6GAL1

Identifiers

PMID40767522
PMCPMC12421841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.