Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40767246›Full record

ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2025

Hydrophone placement yields high variability in detection of Epinephelus striatus calls at a spawning site.

Cameron J Van Horn, Alli C Candelmo, Scott A Heppell, Croy R M McCoy, Christy V Pattengill-Semmens, Lynn Waterhouse, Laurent M Cherubin, J Christopher Taylor, William Michaels, James Locascio and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Hydrophone placement yields high variability in detection of Epinephelus striatus calls at a spawning site.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Cameron J Van HornScripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2660-7195
Alli C CandelmoReef Environmental Education Foundation (REEF), Key Largo, Florida, USA.
Scott A HeppellOregon State University Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Sciences, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
Croy R M McCoyDepartment of Environment, Cayman Islands Government, George Town, Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands.
Christy V Pattengill-SemmensReef Environmental Education Foundation (REEF), Key Largo, Florida, USA.
Lynn WaterhouseScripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7455-7632
Laurent M CherubinHarbor Branch Oceanographic Institute, Florida Atlantic University, Fort Pierce, Florida, USA.
J Christopher TaylorNational Ocean Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Beaufort, North Carolina, USA.
William MichaelsNational Ocean Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Beaufort, North Carolina, USA.
James LocascioMote Marine Laboratory, Sarasota, Florida, USA.
Ali K IbrahimHarbor Branch Oceanographic Institute, Florida Atlantic University, Fort Pierce, Florida, USA.
Brice X SemmensScripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.

Funding

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration International Fisheries Science Research ProgramNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Ocean Acoustic ProgramNOAA Fisheries QUEST (Quantitative Ecology and Socioeconomics Training) program
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Passive acoustic monitoring is a cost-effective, minimally invasive technology commonly used to study behavior and population dynamics of soniferous fish species. To understand the strengths and limitations of acoustic monitoring for this purpose at fish spawning aggregations (FSA) requires an assessment of the variability in aggregation-associated sounds (AAS) as a function of time, space, and proximity for spawning fishes of interest. Here, we evaluate temporal and spatial trends in the detection of AAS by Nassau Grouper (Epinephelus striatus) using an array of six hydrophones deployed across a large Nassau Grouper FSA at Little Cayman, Cayman Islands. We collected continuous data for nine days during a winter spawning season and subsequently used an automatic classifier to extract the embedded Nassau Grouper AAS. Using these data, we analyzed variability in spatiotemporal AAS detection rates across the array with a Bayesian mixed effects model. We found high variability in the detection of AAS across the spawning site, with positive correlations among neighboring hydrophone pairs trending toward negative correlations with distances exceeding 350 m. Indeed, temporal trends in AAS rates at the spawning site were approximately inverted at the two most distant hydrophones (~600 m). Across the hydrophone network, our model predicted strong positive effects of fish proximity, spawning behavior, and crepuscular periods on detected AAS. Our findings suggest hydrophone placement can strongly influence AAS detection rates and even basic temporal patterns in AAS across the spawning season. Given both the vagaries of movement and behavior of aggregating fish at spawning sites and the limits of AAS detection using standard monitoring tools, we suggest spawning site acoustic monitoring programs deploy hydrophone arrays of sufficient size to capture the site-wide trends in AAS rates if possible; this is particularly true if researchers hope to compare/contrast AAS rates between spawning sites or across seasons for the purpose of population assessment.

Indexed as

AcousticsPerciformesSexual Behavior, AnimalVocalization, AnimalAnimalsCaribbean RegionEndangered SpeciesModels, Biologicalautomatic classifierfish callsFSAhydroacousticsmovement ecologyspawning aggregation

Identifiers

PMID40767246
PMCPMC12326518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.