Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40767190›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of health policy and management2025

New Ways of Working to Manage and Improve Quality in Integrated Care Systems in England.

Mirza Lalani, Michele Peters, Thavapriya Sugavanam, Helen Crocker, James Caiels, Harriet Hay, Sarah Gunn, Helen Hogan, Bethan Page, Ray Fitzpatrick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of health policy and management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mirza LalaniDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7851-9062
Michele PetersNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0076-5981
Thavapriya SugavanamNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3033-2028
Helen CrockerNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9786-0749
James CaielsPersonal Social Service Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
Harriet HayPicker Institute Europe, Oxford, UK.
Sarah GunnPicker Institute Europe, Oxford, UK.
Helen HoganDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0920-2093
Bethan PageDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9937-6176
Ray FitzpatrickNuffield College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0607-0563

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntegrated care systems (ICSs) in England were formally established in July 2022 to coordinate the planning and delivery of health and care services. A key responsibility was to address the quality of these services. Our study aimed to examine how ICSs approach this responsibility and to identify opportunities and barriers experienced in their early establishment and development.

methodsA sample of four ICSs were recruited to participate. Interviews and meeting observations were undertaken in two phases (before and after the inception of ICSs) around 12 months apart. A total of 112 interviews were carried out with senior figures in the four ICSs supplemented by observation of relevant meetings and analysis of relevant documents.

resultsRegarding quality, ICSs demonstrated several new ways of working. They set-up new structures for quality governance and created whole-system strategies for quality centred on major responsibilities regarding population health and health inequalities. These strategies required new and relevant metrics to assess quality and outcomes and a greater focus upon co-production in the development of services. They aimed to strike a fine balance between long-standing requirements for quality assurance and new responsibilities for quality improvement (QI). New approaches were underpinned by new collaborations between system partners extending beyond healthcare to include Local Authorities (responsible for social care and public health) and local communities.

conclusionTo address the many challenges of quality, ICSs have created new ways of working cultivating different kinds of collaborative relationships compared to established hierarchical, siloed and top-down ways of working prior to their formation. A focus on improving population health and reducing inequalities has required a shift from "here and now" urgent problem-solving to working with longer timelines. Such changes require patience in the context of political pressure to devote efforts to more salient problems such as waiting lists.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health Care, IntegratedQuality ImprovementEnglandHumansQuality of Health CareState MedicineCare QualityCollaborationEnglandIntegrated Care

Identifiers

PMID40767190
PMCPMC11845859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.