ArticleInternational journal of health policy and management2025
Bottlenecks Analysis in the Intervention of Improving Maternal Health in Rural Areas of Tanzania: A Convergent Mixed-Method Approach.
Article in International journal of health policy and management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acceptability and barriers to rapid HIV/syphilis testing among pregnant Wayuu women in Colombia: A cross-sectional pragmatic study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026Article
- Governance absorption of volume-based procurement: study of dual-track implementation in a public hospital.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAchieving universal health coverage for maternal health (MH) requires a health system that ensures the availability, accessibility, acceptability, and effective use of services. The study aimed to identify bottlenecks that hinder project outcomes of MH in the rural districts of Tanzania.
methodsThis study employed a convergent mixed-method approach to conduct the bottleneck analysis. Quantitative data were collected to identify indicators of MH utilization, with source including Tanzanian health statistics, health facilities and the women in reproductive age (WRA) survey. In-depth interviews (IDIs) and focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted with WRA, their families, community health workers (CHWs), and healthcare personnel (HP) to gain insight into factors influencing healthcare utilization from both a demand and an environmental perspective. Following the Tanahashi steps, the quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and the qualitative data were analyzed using a thematic approach. The findings from both were integrated to identify bottlenecks toward effective coverage and how bottlenecks affected the utilization of MH services.
resultsCommunity awareness and acceptance were observed to be high, however only a limited number of individuals had received MH services. Utilization rates for antenatal care (ANC) and postnatal care (PNC) were 17.4% and 22.0%, respectively. This suggests that efforts to enhance awareness may be inadequate to change social norms and lead to health behaviors. Furthermore, even when women utilize the service, they may not do so in a timely or consistent manner due to low service quality or unsatisfactory experiences.
conclusionTo strengthen the logic model, contextual factors such as provider attitudes, service quality, supportive family, and community climate need to be considered to ensure that WRAs are satisfied with and continue to access services. With building supply-side infrastructure, ongoing efforts to change stakeholders' perceptions of MH services and utilization patterns will be needed to improve the coverage of MH services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.