ArticleJournal of healthcare leadership2025
Sustained Impact of an Intramural Faculty Leadership Training Program at an Academic Medical Center.
Article in Journal of healthcare leadership, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To examine the sustained impact of a faculty leadership program at an academic health center (AHC) on participants' perceived effectiveness in leadership skills and leadership attainment compared to faculty controls. Methods: The sample included 95 faculty members who participated in the year-long Faculty Leadership Institute (FLI). We compared FLI participants to 156 unmatched faculty controls. Participants completed online surveys self-reporting on perceived effectiveness in leadership skills, and leadership positions attained an average of 7 years after program completion. Background information, such as demographic characteristics and academic rank, was obtained from the faculty affairs office. Results: The sample of participants was 47% female, 76% White, with an average age of Conclusion: Findings support sustained benefits of the FLI program, particularly in perceived effectiveness of leadership skills, regardless of gender or race. Although additional research is needed to demonstrate how the positive effects translate to system-level outcomes (eg, research funding, patient care), continued efforts to develop talented faculty members are important to ensure a succession of well-prepared leaders at AHCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.