ReviewApplications in plant sciences
Analysis of plant metabolomics data using identification-free approaches.
Review in Applications in plant sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chemical Ontogeny in Plants: Developmental Dynamics of Specialized Metabolism and Implications for Ecology, Quality Control, and Bioprospecting.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Application of Metabolomics in Defence Responses ofMetabolites · 2026Review
- Phenolic Profile and Antioxidant Capacity of Extracts from Papache (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Stress-Induced Plant Specialized Metabolism: Signaling, Multi-Omics Integration, and Plant-Derived Antimicrobial Metabolites to Combat Antimicrobial Resistance.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- An integrated annotation strategy for the phytochemical characterization of Xie-Bai-San decoction based on UPLC-Q Exactive Orbitrap HRMS, multi-database screening, and feature-based molecular networking.Frontiers in chemistry · 2026Article
- Analysis of plant metabolomics data using identification-free approaches.Applications in plant sciencesReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plant metabolomes are structurally diverse. One of the most popular techniques for sampling this diversity is liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS), which typically detects thousands of peaks from single organ extracts, many representing true metabolites. These peaks are usually annotated using in-house retention time or spectral libraries, in silico fragmentation libraries, and increasingly through computational techniques such as machine learning. Despite these advances, over 85% of LC-MS peaks remain unidentified, posing a major challenge for data analysis and biological interpretation. This bottleneck limits our ability to fully understand the diversity, functions, and evolution of plant metabolites. In this review, we first summarize current approaches for metabolite identification, highlighting their challenges and limitations. We further focus on alternative strategies that bypass the need for metabolite identification, allowing researchers to interpret global metabolic patterns and pinpoint key metabolite signals. These methods include molecular networking, distance-based approaches, information theory-based metrics, and discriminant analysis. Additionally, we explore their practical applications in plant science and highlight a set of useful tools to support researchers in analyzing complex plant metabolomics data. By adopting these approaches, researchers can enhance their ability to uncover new insights into plant metabolism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.