ArticleMachine learning2022
Semi-parametric Bayes regression with network-valued covariates.
Article in Machine learning, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bayesian scalar-on-network regression with applications to brain functional connectivity.Biometrics · 2025Article
- Identifying microbial drivers in biological phenotypes with a Bayesian network regression model.Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Accounting for network noise in graph-guided Bayesian modeling of structured high-dimensional data.Biometrics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although there has been an explosive rise in network data in a variety of disciplines, there is very limited development of regression modeling approaches based on high-dimensional networks. The scarce literature in this area typically assume linear relationships between the outcome and the high-dimensional network edges that results in an inflated model plagued by the curse of dimensionality and these models are unable to accommodate non-linear relationships or higher order interactions. In order to overcome these limitations, we develop a novel two-stage Bayesian non-parametric regression modeling framework using high-dimensional networks as covariates, which first finds a lower dimensional node-specific representation for the networks, and then embeds these representations in a flexible Gaussian process regression framework along with supplemental covariates for modeling the continuous outcome variable. Moving from edge-level analysis to node-level model allows us to scale up to high-dimensional networks, and enables node selection via an extension of the Gaussian process framework that involves spike-and-slab priors on the lengthscale parameters. Extensive simulations show a distinct advantage of the proposed approach in terms of prediction, coverage, and node selection. The proposed model achieves considerable gains when predicting posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) resilience based on brain networks in our motivating neuroimaging applications, and also identifies important brain regions associated with PTSD. In contrast, existing non-linear approaches that employ the full-edge set or those that use other dimension reduction techniques on the network are not equipped for node selection and results in poor prediction and characterization of predictive uncertainty, while linear approaches using the edge-level features are overly inflated and typically result in poor performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.