Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40766893›Full record

ArticleJournal of physics D: Applied physics2025

On the applicability of x-ray strain imaging using the edge illumination technique in biomedical applications.

Carlo Peiffer, A Astolfo, M Endrizzi, C K Hagen, A Olivo, P R T Munro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of physics D: Applied physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Microfluidic Gratings for X-Ray Phase Contrast Imaging.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Carlo PeifferDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, Gower Street, WC1E 6BT London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1479-6344
A AstolfoDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, Gower Street, WC1E 6BT London, United Kingdom.
M EndrizziDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, Gower Street, WC1E 6BT London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7810-2301
C K HagenDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, Gower Street, WC1E 6BT London, United Kingdom.
A OlivoDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, Gower Street, WC1E 6BT London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7150-2951
P R T MunroDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, Gower Street, WC1E 6BT London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9306-3673

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Strain imaging using conventional x-ray tomography is a widely established technique for investigating the mechanical deformation of materials, including cement and batteries. However, its biomedical applications are primarily restricted to bone tissue due to the low contrast of soft tissues. X-ray phase contrast imaging, offering superior contrast-to-noise ratios in soft tissues, can in principle overcome this limitation. This study explores the feasibility of x-ray strain imaging for soft tissues using edge illumination (EI), a laboratory-based x-ray phase contrast technique. A phantom mimicking the mechanical properties of healthy and tumorous soft tissues, with a stiff inclusion invisible to conventional x-ray imaging, was tested alongside chicken soft tissue fixed in ethanol. While our study confirmed that EI phase contrast imaging provides improved contrast for such samples compared to absorption imaging, it also revealed a reduction in strain retrieval precision. Artefacts caused by absorbing bridges in the mask design and errors arising from differential phase signal integration, which vary spatially between scans, were identified as key limiting factors. Consequently, EI phase contrast strain imaging was unable to locate phantom inclusions based on mechanical contrast. However, EI's capability to increase spatial sampling frequency without compromising the field of view improved strain retrieval precision using its absorption contrast beyond that achieved with conventional x-ray strain imaging. These findings highlight the potential and challenges of applying EI to strain analysis in soft tissues, providing insights into its limitations and opportunities for further improvement.

Indexed as

edge illuminationlab based x-ray phase contrastsoft tissue x-ray strain imagingstrain imagingx-ray phase contrast

Identifiers

PMID40766893
PMCPMC12319699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.