ReviewNeuropsychiatric disease and treatment2025
Advances and Challenges in Depression Marker Research.
Review in Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transcriptomic characteristics of plasma from Chinese ethnic minority patients with major depressive disorder.Translational psychiatry · 2026Article
- Amino Acid-Fatty Acid Profile as a Novel Predictive Method in the Assessment of Diagnosis and Treatment Efficacy of Anxiety-Related Disorders and Mood Disorders.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- From EEG signals to quantitative assessment: predicting depression severity using a novel deep learning framework.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Ceramides and neuroinflammation as immunometabolic drivers and biomarkers of major depressive disorder, treatment-resistant depression, and suicidal vulnerability.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Depressive disorders diagnosis relies on subjective clinical assessment due to the lack of validated biomarkers. This review synthesizes recent advances in depression biomarkers across genetic, epigenetic, neuroendocrine, neuroimaging, immune/inflammatory, and gut microbiota domains. Literature was systematically searched via PubMed/Web of Science.We analyze mechanisms, highlight challenges (eg, clinical heterogeneity, inadequate animal models), and propose future directions: multidimensional bioinformatics, AI-driven models, RDoC framework implementation, and interdisciplinary collaboration. Critically, our analysis reveals that multimodal integration of biomarkers-rather than single-domain approaches-holds the greatest promise for overcoming diagnostic heterogeneity and guiding personalized interventions. These strategies may revolutionize MDD management through early detection and tailored therapeutics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.