Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40766809›Full record

ReviewJournal of experimental orthopaedics2025

Impact of tibial supplementary fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction for soft tissue auto and allografts: Modest enhancement in stability and increased incidence of pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Fuwen Zheng, Jiahao Gao, Chenyu Wang, Xu Zheng, Jinshuo Tang, Jinrui Zhang, Jianlin Zuo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fuwen ZhengDepartment of Orthopedics China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University Changchun Jilin China.
Jiahao GaoDepartment of Orthopedics China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University Changchun Jilin China.
Chenyu WangDepartment of Orthopedics China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University Changchun Jilin China.
Xu ZhengWenzhou Medical College Affiliated Yueqing Hospital Yueqing Zhejiang China.
Jinshuo TangDepartment of Orthopedics China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University Changchun Jilin China.
Jinrui ZhangDepartment of Orthopedics China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University Changchun Jilin China.
Jianlin ZuoDepartment of Orthopedics China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University Changchun Jilin China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3546-2208

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate whether the joint function, stability and safety of tibial supplementary fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is superior compared with tibial screw fixation alone. Methods: PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE and Web of Science were searched, tracking until 12 April 2025. Eligible studies included published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and low-risk cohort studies comparing clinical outcomes and complications between tibial screw interference with supplementary fixation (Group I) and tibial screw interference alone or with a sheath (Group II). RCTs were assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, while cohort studies were evaluated with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Methodological index for non-randomized studies. Model selection (random or fixed-effects) was based on data heterogeneity. Results: This meta-analysis included eight studies with 943 patients (Group I: 386, Group II: 557). Group I showed no significant differences in side-to-side difference (SSD) in the sheath subgroup at 24 months, SSD <3 mm at 9.1 kg at 12 and 24 months, or manual maximum testing at 24 months, Pivot test at 8-12 and 24 months, Lachman test at 8-12 months, International Knee Documentation Committee objective and subjective score at 24 months compared to Group II. Group I demonstrated statistically significant reductions in SSD (mean difference: -1.02; 95% CI: -1.79 to -0.25; Conclusion: Enhanced supplementary tibial fixation with soft tissue autografts and allografts offers similar joint function and a modest enhancement of stability compared to tibial interference screw fixation alone, but is associated with a higher incidence of pain. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort studies have been analysed, alongside RCTs, and thus this is the level of evidence.

Indexed as

anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructionhamstringscrew interferencesupplementary fixationtibial fixation

Identifiers

PMID40766809
PMCPMC12322697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.