ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2025
Anterior knee pain is a relevant cause for dissatisfaction after total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing.
Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patellar resurfacing in primary total knee arthroplasty is associated with fewer reoperations but comparable clinical and functional outcomes: an umbrella review of meta-analyses.Arthroplasty (London, England) · 2026Review
- Early recovery patterns differ between medially congruent and posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty, with comparable 2-year outcomes: A triple-blinded randomized clinical trial.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Similar secondary patellar resurfacing but higher tibial revision risk with posterior stabilized versus medial pivot total knee arthroplasty: A registry analysis.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Autologous distal femoral condyle graft for patellar reconstruction during TKA in posttraumatic ankylosis: a case report.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Anterior knee pain is a relevant cause for dissatisfaction after total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of the present study was to investigate the incidence of anterior knee pain (AKP) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) without patellar resurfacing and to determine how patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) differ in patients with and without AKP. Methods: All primary TKAs from the local registry operated on between 2010 and 2016 were reviewed for secondary patellar resurfacing and asked about the presence of AKP (yes/no), satisfaction with the outcome of the TKA (Visual Analogue Scale [VAS] 1-10) and completion of the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and Anterior Knee Pain Scale (AKPS). A total of 1371 primary TKAs were included, of which 201 patients had died, and 972 (70.9%) completed the additional questionnaires after a mean follow-up of 9.9 years. Results: AKP was reported by 157 patients (16.2%), and eight patients (0.6%) had undergone secondary patellar resurfacing within two to five years after primary TKA, two of them with an additional increase of the insert due to instability. Patients who reported AKP had significantly worse OKS (mean 24.0 vs. 39.6), AKPS (mean 50.8 vs. 79.1) and satisfaction (mean 4.8 vs. 8.4/10). There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of AKP by sex (men 15.1% vs. women 16.4%), age at surgery (<60 years 19.6% vs. ≥60 years 15.2%), comorbidities (ASA 1/2 14.5% vs. ASA 3/4 18.1%) and constraint (unconstrained 15.9% vs. rotating-hinge 26.3%). The incidence of AKP in unconstrained TKA was 16.0% in CR, 12.6% in UC and 18.5% in PS implants. AKP occured significantly more frequently in patients with a BMI > 40 kg/m Conclusion: In this study with long-term follow-up, a relevant proportion of patients reported AKP, which had a negative impact on PROMs and satisfaction. However, the rate of secondary patellar resurfacing was very low. Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.