ArticleJAMIA open2025
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease screening using time-frequency features of self-recorded respiratory sounds.
Article in JAMIA open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the third leading cause of death worldwide, with up to 70% of cases remaining undiagnosed. This paper proposes a COPD screening tool based on time-frequency representation features of self-recorded respiratory sounds. Materials and Methods: Respiratory sound samples (breath and cough sounds) were extracted from COPD and asymptomatic non-COPD volunteers using a large, scientific-purpose database. We analyzed 39 time-frequency representation features of breath and cough sounds, combined with age, sex, and smoking status, using Autoencoder neural networks and random forest (RF) algorithms. We compared the performance of different breath and cough RF models built to detect COPD: one based exclusively on sound features, one based exclusively on sociodemographic characteristics, and one based on sound features and sociodemographic characteristics. Results: Models including breathing features outperformed models exclusively based on sociodemographic characteristics. Specifically, the model combining sociodemographic characteristics and breathing features achieved an area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.901, 0.836, 0.871, and 0.761, respectively, in the test set, representing a substantial increase in AUC when compared to the model based exclusively on sociodemographic characteristics (0.901 vs 0.818). Discussion: Our results suggest that a lightweight collection of the time-frequency representation features of self-recorded beathing sounds could effectively improve the predictive performance of COPD screening or case-finding questionnaires. Conclusion: COPD screening through self-recorded breathing sounds could be easily integrated as a low-cost first step in case-finding programs, potentially contributing to mitigate COPD underdiagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.