ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2025
Hip arthrogram in developmental dysplasia of the hip: A review.
Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Imaging in hip disorders in childhood and adolescence].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The hip arthrogram is an invaluable tool in the management of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). The pathological findings seen on arthrogram in hips with DDH were first described by Severin and Leveuf in the 1940s. These findings were later shown to correlate with findings at open reduction, and in more recent years, on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies as well. The medial sub-adductor technique is most commonly used to perform hip arthrograms. The neutral antero-posterior, frog leg and Salter position views tend to be the most informative; however, arthrography also provides the opportunity for dynamic assessment and stress views. The structures that can be assessed in detail during hip arthrograms include the cartilaginous femoral head; the labrum, limbus and neolimbus; the bony and cartilaginous acetabular roof; intra-capsular structures like pulvinar, ligamentum teres and transverse acetabular ligament; and extra-capsular structures like the psoas shadow and capsular constriction. Measurements made on arthrogram, such as medial dye pool and femoral head coverage, help guide intra-operative decision-making and can have prognostic value as well. While some authors propose that the best indicator of outcome is the quality of the initial reduction, others have demonstrated that outcomes cannot be predicted accurately based on initial post-reduction arthrograms due to the phenomenon of "docking", and that interval arthrograms and/or MRI studies can help in decision making. Finally, it must be remembered that arthrographic findings should be interpreted in conjunction with clinical findings, with the aim being to achieve a reduction that is both safe and stable. This review paper summarises the existing evidence on hip arthrography for DDH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.