Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40766767›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2025

Synthetic and semi-synthetic antioxidants in medicine and food industry: a review.

Jan Tauchen, Lukáš Huml, Michal Jurášek, Joe M Regenstein, Fatih Ozogul

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Evaluation of antioxidant and anti-inflammatory potential andJournal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jan TauchenDepartment of Food Science, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food, and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká, Czechia.
Lukáš HumlDepartment of Chemistry of Natural Compounds, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Technická, Czechia.
Michal JurášekDepartment of Chemistry of Natural Compounds, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Technická, Czechia.
Joe M RegensteinDepartment of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Fatih OzogulDepartment of Seafood Processing Technology, Faculty of Fisheries, Çukurova University, Adana, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oxidative stress is recognized as both a causative and contributing factor in many human diseases. As a result, significant research has been devoted to the development of synthetic and semi-synthetic antioxidants (ATs). This review summarizes the therapeutic potential of synthetic ATs, explores their possible clinical applications, and highlights novel structural modifications aimed at improving their pharmacological properties. Additionally, it presents ideas for refining current antioxidant testing methodologies. Despite the ongoing research, the therapeutic efficacy of synthetic ATs remains ambiguous for several reasons. These include the following: therapeutic benefits resulting from non-antioxidant mechanisms, insufficient dosage to elicit an antioxidant effect, poor oral bioavailability, a narrow therapeutic index, or toxicity that precludes clinical use. Nevertheless, some compounds, such as ebselen, edaravone, MitoQ10, and potentially N-acetylcysteine, have shown promising results. However, further studies are needed to confirm their efficacy and clarify whether their therapeutic effects are truly mediated through antioxidant mechanisms. Dietary antioxidants have achieved relatively higher clinical success, although their toxicity has also led to the withdrawal of some agents. One emerging therapeutic strategy involves inhibition of NADPH oxidase (NOX) enzymatic activity, with compounds such as ebselen, S17834, and GKT137831 showing potential across various disease models. Efforts to enhance antioxidant properties through molecular modifications, using advanced technologies such as prodrug strategies, nanotechnology, polymer complexation, targeted delivery systems, or conversion into inhalable formulations, have yielded variable success. Still, confirming the clinical relevance of newly developed antioxidants will require a paradigm shift in the testing approaches. Future studies must better define the molecular context of antioxidant action, including the following: which biomolecules are being protected, the specific radical species targeted, the tissue and subcellular distribution of the antioxidant, and how levels of endogenous antioxidants and reactive oxygen species (ROS) change post-administration (e.g., within the mitochondria). Despite extensive research, only a few synthetic antioxidants, such as edaravone, are currently used in clinical practice. Currently, no new antioxidant drugs are expected to receive regulatory approval in the near future.

Indexed as

chelation therapyfree radical scavengingoxidative stresssemi-synthetic antioxidantssynthetic antioxidants

Identifiers

PMID40766767
PMCPMC12321848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.