Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40766753›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2025

Cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury: mechanisms and promising therapies.

Mingming Yang, Boya Liu, Bingqian Chen, Yuntian Shen, Guangliang Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mingming Yang *Department of Pediatrics, Binhai County People's Hospital, Yancheng, Jiangsu, China.
Boya Liu *Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu and Ministry of Education, Co-Innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, NMPA Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Tissue Engineering Technology Products, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
Bingqian Chen *Department of Orthopaedics, Changshu Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, First Peoples' Hospital of Changshu City, Changshu, Jiangsu, China.
Yuntian ShenKey Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu and Ministry of Education, Co-Innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, NMPA Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Tissue Engineering Technology Products, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
Guangliang LiuDepartment of Pediatrics, Binhai County People's Hospital, Yancheng, Jiangsu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury (Cerebral I/R injury) is a critical pathological process following ischemic stroke, closely associated with multiple mechanisms including oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, and neuronal apoptosis. It also involves the alteration and regulation of numerous key genes and non-coding RNAs. Due to its complex regulatory mechanisms, there are currently no Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs specifically targeting Cerebral I/R injury. Developing effective therapeutic strategies for Cerebral I/R injury remains a significant challenge in medical research. This review summarizes current treatment approaches for Cerebral I/R injury, which include traditional drugs, antioxidants, neuroprotective agents, exosomes, noncoding RNA therapeutics and combined intervention therapy. Pharmacotherapies exert positive effects on Cerebral I/R injury through antioxidative, anti-inflammatory, and neuroprotective mechanisms. Exosomes and noncoding RNA therapeutics can mitigate brain cell damage and promote neural function recovery by regulating the expression of downstream key genes via miRNAs, demonstrating potential as novel therapeutic options. Emerging evidence indicates that combined therapeutic strategies incorporating nanoparticle-mediated targeting demonstrate efficacy in treating cerebral I/R injury. By exploring the mechanisms of action and clinical application prospects of these different treatment strategies, this review aims to provide new insights and methods for the clinical management of Cerebral I/R injury.

Indexed as

antioxidantscerebral ischemia-reperfusion injuryexosomesneuroprotectionnon-coding RNAtraditional drugs

Identifiers

PMID40766753
PMCPMC12323178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.