Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40766598›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

AlignmentFold and AlignmentPartition: Improving the align-then-fold approach for RNA secondary structure prediction.

Abhinav Mittal, David H Mathews

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Abhinav MittalDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics and Center for RNA Biology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, 14642, USA.
David H MathewsDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics and Center for RNA Biology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, 14642, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2907-6557

Funding

RNA Structure Modeling Using Physics and Sequence ComparisonR35GM145283 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI DAVID H. MATHEWS · 2022 to 2026
$2.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM145283
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The combination of free energy minimization with sequence covariation analysis is a popular approach for predicting conserved secondary structure using a fixed alignment of homologous RNA sequences. In this work we revisit this approach by developing the new AlignmentFold and AlignmentPartition programs. AlignmentFold and AlignmentPartition predict consensus minimum free energy structures and base pairing probabilities, respectively. We determined new nearest neighbor thermodynamic parameters for gaps and non-canonical base pairs that align with base pairs. These frequently occur for structure prediction with a fixed input alignment. We assessed the impact of alignment prediction method and size on the prediction accuracy. We also assessed the improvement in prediction accuracy conferred by sequence covariation analysis. In contrast to previous solutions, we do not include covariation in the scoring of structure quality and achieve prediction accuracy as good as other tools. AlignmentFold and AlignmentPartition are freely available as part of the RNAstructure software package at https://rna.urmc.rochester.edu/RNAstructure.html.

Indexed as

align-then-foldconsensus structurecovariationfree energy minimizationpartition functionRNA secondary structure prediction

Identifiers

PMID40766598
PMCPMC12324228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.