Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40766580›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Development of a Targeted Choroidal Injury Model for the Study of Retinal Degenerations and Therapeutic Cell Replacement.

Narendra Pandala, Lorena De Melo Haefeli, Mallory Lang, Edwin M Stone, Robert F Mullins, Budd A Tucker, Ian C Han

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Narendra Pandala
Lorena De Melo Haefeli
Mallory Lang
Edwin M Stone
Robert F Mullins
Budd A Tucker
Ian C Han

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Choroidal loss is an important pathophysiological step in many retinal diseases, but few reliable translational models of choroidal injury exist. Here, we report a new targeted choroidal injury model using bioconjugated saporins and compare it models of systemic sodium iodate administration. Methods: Wild-type Sprague-Dawley rats were given suprachoroidal injections of anti-CD38 or anti-CD105 antibodies conjugated to saporin immunotoxin (10 µl at 0.05 µg/µL) to induce selective choroidal endothelial cell injury. These animals were compared to wild-type rats given sodium iodate (75 mg/kg) via tail vein injections, with a dose escalation study (25, 50, and 75 mg/kg) in immunocompromised (Sprague-Dawley Rag2/Il2g double-knockout) rats. Animals were examined at 1-, 2-, and 3-weeks post-treatment, and the degree of choroidal injury compared using fundus photography, optical coherence tomography, and immunohistochemistry. Results: Suprachoroidal administration of anti-CD38 or anti-CD105 saporins resulted in severe choroidal vascular injury localized to the injection site, without damage to adjacent choroidal vasculature, progressive injury over time, or development of choroidal neovascularization. By contrast, sodium iodate treated animals had rapid, diffuse choroidal loss which progressed throughout the study time points, with fatal systemic side effects at the highest (75 mg/kg) dose. Conclusions: Suprachoroidal injection of anti-CD38 and anti-CD105 saporins results in targeted, localized, non-progressive choroidal injury in rats. These models offer alternatives to systemic sodium iodate administration, which causes diffuse, progressive choroidal injury. Translational Relevance: Immunotoxin-based models of targeted choroidal injury may be useful for understanding pathways of retinal degeneration and facilitating development of therapies for diseases involving choroidal cell loss.

Identifiers

PMID40766580
PMCPMC12324270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.