ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Unfolding spatiotemporal representations of 3D visual perception in the human brain.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although visual input is initially recorded in two dimensions on our retinas, we perceive and interact with the world in three dimensions. Achieving 3D perception requires the brain to integrate 2D spatial representations with multiple depth cues, such as binocular disparity. However, most studies typically examine 2D and depth information in isolation, leaving the integrated nature of 3D spatial encoding largely underexplored. In this study, we collected a large-scale, multimodal neuroimaging dataset consisting of multiple EEG and fMRI sessions while participants viewed stereoscopic 3D stimuli through red-green anaglyph glasses. Participants first completed a behavioral session including depth judgement tasks and a novel cube adjustment task to quantify and calibrate individual depth perception in units of binocular disparity. Then during two EEG and two fMRI sessions, participants passively viewed stimuli presented at 64 systematically sampled 3D locations, yielding over 66,000 trials in total across ten participants. Combining this large-scale EEG-fMRI dataset with computational methods via representational similarity analysis, we not only systematically characterized the spatiotemporal representation of multiple spatial features in 3D perception but also explored how different coordinate systems (e.g., Cartesian or Polar) might be employed across brain regions and time. Our results reveal that human brains employ multiple types of spatial feature representations and coordinate systems to encode spatial locations at different temporal stages and across distinct cortical regions. In addition to strong representations of 2D space throughout visual cortex, we find unique representations for depth and 3D features in later timepoints and visual areas, including some evidence for 3D processing in parahippocampus. These findings contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the spatiotemporal organization of neural representations that support 3D perception. Additionally, our novel large dataset will be made openly available to support future research on 3D perception and spatial cognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.