ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Covalent Degraders of Immune Regulatory Transcription Factors IRF8 and IRF5.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Transcription factors are among the most challenging targets for drug discovery due to their lack of classical binding pockets and high degree of intrinsic disorder, despite the therapeutic importance of many of these proteins. IRF5 and IRF8 are key transcriptional regulators of innate immune signaling that orchestrate pro-inflammatory gene expression programs in response to stimuli such as toll-like receptor activation, making them central players in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Despite their therapeutic interest, direct targeting of IRF5 and IRF8 has remained challenging. Here, we screened a library of cysteine-reactive covalent ligands to identify hits that could degrade IRF5. We identified acrylamide EN1033 as the top hit, which not only led to IRF5 loss in a proteasome-dependent manner but also bound directly and covalently to the IRF5 protein, inhibiting IRF5-specific transcriptional activity in a macrophage cell line. Upon further analysis, however, we found that EN1033 not only engaged and degraded IRF5 but also more robustly and rapidly engaged and degraded a related inflammatory transcription factor, IRF8. We further demonstrated that EN1033 destabilized and degraded IRF5 and IRF8 by covalently targeting C28 and C223, respectively, as evidenced by the attenuation of their degradation through mutagenesis of these cysteines. We also found that IRF8 loss led to the downregulation and inhibition of IRF5 activity, suggesting a crosstalk between these two transcription factors, which are both targeted by EN1033. Overall, we identify an early-stage pathfinder molecule that covalently targets IRF8 and IRF5, thereby degrading these transcription factors and inhibiting their pro-inflammatory transcriptional activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.