ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
A unifying theory of receptive field heterogeneity predicts hippocampal spatial tuning.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neural populations exhibit receptive fields that vary in their sizes and shapes. Despite the prevalence of such tuning heterogeneity, we lack a unified theory of its computational benefits. Here, we present a framework that unifies and extends previous theories, finding that receptive field heterogeneity generally increases the information encoded in population activity. The information gain depends on heterogeneity in receptive field size, shape, and on the dimensionality of the encoded quantity. For populations encoding two-dimensional quantities, such as place cells encoding allocentric spatial position, our theory predicts that both size and shape receptive field heterogeneity are necessary to induce information gain, whereas size heterogeneity alone is insufficient. We thus turned to CA1 hippocampal activity to test our theoretical predictions-in particular, to measure shape heterogeneity, which has previously received little attention. To overcome limitations of traditional methods for estimating place cell tuning, we developed a fully probabilistic approach for measuring size and shape heterogeneity, in which tuning estimates were strategically weighted by explicitly measured uncertainty arising from biased or incomplete traversals of the environment. Our method furnished evidence that hippocampal receptive fields indeed exhibit strong degrees of size and shape heterogeneity, abiding by the normative predictions of our theory. Overall, our work makes novel predictions about the relative benefits of receptive field heterogeneities beyond our application to place cells, and provides a principled technique for testing them.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.