Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40766478›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

A unifying theory of receptive field heterogeneity predicts hippocampal spatial tuning.

Zach Cohen, Jan Drugowitsch

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zach CohenDepartment of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School.ORCID 0000-0002-6076-6265
Jan DrugowitschDepartment of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School.ORCID 0000-0002-7846-0408

Funding

Project C: Neural basis of causal inference in continuous navigationU19NS118246 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI HAEFNER, RALF MANFRED · 2020 to 2024
$12.0M
Distributional Reinforcement Learning in the BrainR01NS116753 · NINDS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI DRUGOWITSCH, JAN, UCHIDA, NAOSHIGE · 2020 to 2024
$2.9M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS116753NINDS NIH HHS U19 NS118246
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural populations exhibit receptive fields that vary in their sizes and shapes. Despite the prevalence of such tuning heterogeneity, we lack a unified theory of its computational benefits. Here, we present a framework that unifies and extends previous theories, finding that receptive field heterogeneity generally increases the information encoded in population activity. The information gain depends on heterogeneity in receptive field size, shape, and on the dimensionality of the encoded quantity. For populations encoding two-dimensional quantities, such as place cells encoding allocentric spatial position, our theory predicts that both size and shape receptive field heterogeneity are necessary to induce information gain, whereas size heterogeneity alone is insufficient. We thus turned to CA1 hippocampal activity to test our theoretical predictions-in particular, to measure shape heterogeneity, which has previously received little attention. To overcome limitations of traditional methods for estimating place cell tuning, we developed a fully probabilistic approach for measuring size and shape heterogeneity, in which tuning estimates were strategically weighted by explicitly measured uncertainty arising from biased or incomplete traversals of the environment. Our method furnished evidence that hippocampal receptive fields indeed exhibit strong degrees of size and shape heterogeneity, abiding by the normative predictions of our theory. Overall, our work makes novel predictions about the relative benefits of receptive field heterogeneities beyond our application to place cells, and provides a principled technique for testing them.

Identifiers

PMID40766478
PMCPMC12324321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.