Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40766365›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

How individual differences shape ERP responses to visual statistical learning.

Joanna Morris, Emma Kealey, Frankie Greene, Joemari Pulido, Tess Rooney, Natalia Alzate, Ethan Moore, Crismar Ramos-Marte

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Joanna MorrisSchool of Cognitive Science, Hampshire College, Amherst, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7771-1818
Emma KealeyDepartment of Psychology, Providence College, Providence, RI, USA.
Frankie GreeneSchool of Cognitive Science, Hampshire College, Amherst, MA, USA.
Joemari PulidoDepartment of Psychology, Providence College, Providence, RI, USA.
Tess RooneyDepartment of Psychology, Providence College, Providence, RI, USA.
Natalia AlzateDepartment of Psychology, Providence College, Providence, RI, USA.
Ethan MooreDepartment of Psychology, Providence College, Providence, RI, USA.
Crismar Ramos-MarteDepartment of Psychology, Providence College, Providence, RI, USA.

Funding

Training CoreP20GM103430 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND · PI Bongsup P Cho · 2012 to 2026
$63.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103430
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Statistical learning (SL) enables the extraction of regularities from sensory input, yet the neural dynamics supporting this process-particularly in the visual modality-remain incompletely understood. Sixty-seven adults were familiarized with a continuous stream of shape sequences containing statistical structure that defined shape triplets. We recorded EEG to familiar sequences (presented in isolation) and unfamiliar foils. Both early (N100) and late (N400) event related potential (ERP) components were significantly more negative for unfamiliar than familiar sequences, reflecting robust neural sensitivity to learned structure. Notably, these familiarity effects were evident in both high- and low-performing participants and were not predicted by overall behavioral sensitivity, suggesting that neural indices of learning can emerge independently of explicit recognition. Follow-up analyses incorporating trial-level accuracy revealed a striking crossover interaction: for sensitive participants, ERP familiarity effects were stronger on correct trials, whereas for insensitive participants, effects were larger on incorrect trials. These findings highlight a dissociation between neural and behavioral measures of statistical learning and underscore the value of ERPs in capturing latent learning processes that may elude conscious awareness.

Identifiers

PMID40766365
PMCPMC12324442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.