Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40766341›Full record

ArticleJMIR data2024

Conflicts of Interest Publication Disclosures: Descriptive Study.

S Scott Graham, Jade Shiva, Nandini Sharma, Joshua B Barbour, Zoltan P Majdik, Justin F Rousseau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR data, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

S Scott GrahamThe University of Texas at Austin.
Jade ShivaThe University of Texas at Austin.
Nandini SharmaThe University of Texas at Austin.
Joshua B BarbourThe University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign.
Zoltan P MajdikNorth Dakota State University.
Justin F RousseauThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center.

Funding

Closing the loop with an automatic referral population and summarization systemR01LM014306 · NLM · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI Yifan Peng, Justin Frederick Rousseau · 2023 to 2026
$2.7M
A Network Science Approach to Conflicts of Interest: Metrics, Policies, and Communication DesignR01GM141476 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI BARBOUR, JOSHUA BEN, GRAHAM, SAMUEL · 2021 to 2024
$832k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM141476NLM NIH HHS R01 LM014306
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Multiple lines of prior research have documented that author conflicts of interest (COI) can compromise the integrity of the biomedical research enterprise. However, continuing research that would investigate why, how, and in what circumstances COI is most risky is stymied by the difficulty in accessing disclosure statements, which are not widely represented in available databases. Objective: In this study, we describe a new open access dataset of COI disclosures extracted from published biomedical journals articles. Methods: To develop the dataset, we used ClinCalc's Top 300 drugs lists for 2017 and 2018 to identify 319 of the most commonly used drugs. Search strategies for each product were developed using the National Library of Medicine's Medical Subject Headings browser and deployed using the eUtilities API in April 2021. We identified the 150 most relevant articles for each product and extracted COI disclosure statements from PubMed, PubMed Central, or retrieved articles as necessary. Results: Conflicts of Interest PublicatiON Disclosures (COIPonD) is a new dataset that captures author-reported COI disclosures for biomedical research articles published in a wide range of journals and subspecialties. COIPonD captures author-reported disclosure information (including lack of disclosure) for over 38,000 PubMed-indexed articles published between 1949 and 2022. The collected articles are indexed by discussed drug products with a focus on the 319 most commonly used drugs in the United States. Conclusions: COIPonD should accelerate research efforts to understand the effects of COI on the biomedical research enterprise. In particular, this dataset should facilitate new studies of COI effects across disciplines and subspecialties.

Indexed as

biomedical publishingConflicts of interestdatasetresearch integrity

Identifiers

PMID40766341
PMCPMC12323890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.